Photo via Daily Mail

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When we see Blair and Brown as the good old days, then we're really in trouble... Welcome to Bolshevik Britain

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Littlejohn, R. (2026, November 12). RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When we see Blair and Brown as the good old days, then we're really in trouble... Welcome to Bolshevik Britain. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/debate/article-16288481/Blair-Brown-good-old-days-trouble-Welcome-Bolshevik-Britain-RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-11-13 · by Richard Littlejohn analysis

Quick Summary

This opinion piece by Richard Littlejohn argues that British and American voters are resisting wealth taxes despite a perceived shift toward left-wing politics. In California, voters rejected Proposition 40, which would have imposed a 5% tax on assets over $1 billion, by a margin of 53% to 47%. The author highlights that around 16,500 high-net-worth individuals have already left Britain since the current Labour government took power, taking an estimated $120 billion with them. Littlejohn contends that the British Left is driven by resentment rather than reality, and warns that targeting millionaires to make up for the lost billions from billionaires reflects a dangerous political trajectory.
Written by AI on 2026-11-13, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).
See how they differ ↓

AI analysis

Story summary

Californians officially rejected Proposition 40, a ballot measure that would have imposed a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of residents with fortunes exceeding $1 billion. The measure, which was defeated by a margin of 53% to 47%, aimed to generate revenue for the state's Medicaid program by sending nine-tenths of the proceeds to healthcare funding. While supporters like Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders framed the proposal as a way to address wealth inequality, critics and California Governor Gavin Newsom warned it could cause the state's wealthiest residents to flee. Opponents specifically highlighted that the tax could impact owners of California sports teams, such as the Los Angeles Rams and Los Angeles Chargers. The measure sparked one of the most expensive ballot fights in the state's history, involving heavy spending from the ultra-rich to prevent the tax. Although the measure failed, some observers noted that the debate around Proposition 40 served as a significant moment for the national and international conversation regarding a potential federal wealth tax.

Written for “California billionaire tax rejected” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 41 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 149911 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-13

How they differ

28 outlets covered “California billionaire tax rejected”.

What each outlet says

One AI summary per outlet of its latest article on this story, written from that article alone and checked against it. Open the article for the outlet's own words.

Daily MailThis outlet13 Nov

This opinion piece by Richard Littlejohn argues that British and American voters are resisting wealth taxes despite a perceived shift toward left-wing politics. In California, voters rejected Proposition 40, which would have imposed a 5% tax on assets over $1 billion, by a margin of 53% to 47%. The author highlights that around 16,500 high-net-worth individuals have already left Britain since the current Labour…

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When we see Blair and Brown as the good old days, then we're really in trouble... Welcome to Bolshevik Britain (this article)2 articles from Daily Mail on this story
Washington Examiner10 Nov

California voters defeated Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a tax on the wealth of billionaires in the state. The proposition received 47.2% support while 53.8% voted against it, according to AP's early results. If approved, this would have been the first such general wealth tax implemented in modern U.S. history.

California billionaire wealth tax fails, dashing liberal dreams →4 articles from Washington Examiner on this story
New York Post11 Nov

California voters have rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to implement a "billionaire tax," by a significant margin. This decision prevents what would have been the first wealth tax in the United States, intended to seize personal savings from billionaires. The proposition's failure is attributed to concerns that it could deter entrepreneurs and investors, leading to an exodus of at least seven billionaires with…

California’s billionaire tax is dead – but the state’s paid a staggering price →4 articles from New York Post on this story
The Independent10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% tax on individuals with over $1 billion in wealth. The measure was designed to address an estimated $100 billion loss in federal healthcare funding over five years and support education and food-assistance programs. Tech billionaires like Sergey Brin opposed the proposition by spending over $333 million, predominantly through his…

Tech billionaires dodge massive wealth tax as California voters decisively reject controversial Proposition →3 articles from The Independent on this story
Los Angeles Times10 Nov

California voters have rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' assets to offset federal healthcare funding cuts. With 53% voting against it and 47% in favor, the measure faced strong opposition across most counties despite significant support in Los Angeles and San Francisco. The campaign against the billionaire tax was one of the most expensive in California history, with…

Billionaire tax rejected on concern squeezing California's ultra-rich would harm the economy →2 articles from Los Angeles Times on this story
ABC News (US)10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, a ballot initiative known as the "billionaires' tax," which aimed to impose a 5% tax on individuals and trusts with assets over $1 billion. The measure was projected to generate around $100 billion over five years but faced significant opposition; the main opposing group, Building a Better California, raised $333.1 million, primarily from billionaires like Sergey Brin…

California's Prop 40 'billionaires' tax' measure is rejected, AP projects →2 articles from ABC News (US) on this story
Show 20 more outlets
The Straits Times5 Nov

As California tallies votes, Proposition 40, a proposed wealth tax targeting billionaires, appears to be trailing despite favorable voter registration for Democrats. The measure would impose a one-time 5% levy on assets of California's estimated 250 billionaires, expected to raise around $100 billion. However, it faces significant opposition due to concerns that such a tax could drive wealthy individuals and…

Billionaire tax measure trails as California tallies votes →2 articles from The Straits Times on this story
NPR10 Nov

California's proposed billionaire wealth tax, Proposition 40, was rejected by voters despite expectations of a favorable political climate. Economists Gabriel Zucman and Joshua Rauh disagree on why Prop 40 failed, with Zucman attributing it to extensive opposition spending—nearly $400 million versus negligible support funding—which overwhelmed voter decision-making processes in California's ballot initiative system.

Why did California's billionaire tax fail to surf the blue wave? →2 articles from NPR on this story
The Guardian10 Nov

Tech industry leaders, notably Google co-founder Sergey Brin who contributed at least $132 million, successfully defeated California's Proposition 40, which proposed a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' wealth for healthcare funding. Silicon Valley elites raised nearly $425 million in total to oppose the measure and supported an initiative (Proposition 42) banning taxes on billionaire wealth, ultimately outspending…

Tech’s biggest names sunk a tax on billionaires’ wealth with $425m and a familiar playbook →2 articles from The Guardian on this story
Time29 Oct

The article discusses Proposition 40 in California, which proposes to impose a one-time tax of 5% on fortunes over $1 billion to fund Medicaid. Billionaires like Elon Musk and Sergey Brin have spent over $333 million opposing the measure, arguing it could drive wealthy individuals out of the state. The author supports Proposition 40 but argues that it does not address deeper economic issues, such as the role of…

Taxing Wealth Makes Sense, But It Won’t Fix Our Economy →
The Hindu3 Nov

On November 3, 2026, California proposed a ballot measure called Proposition 40 that would impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of Californians with over $1 billion in assets. The initiative aims to address federal healthcare funding cuts and has sparked intense debate among political figures and wealthy individuals; tech moguls like Sergey Brin and Larry Page have already started relocating, while others such…

California could become the first State to tax billionaires' wealth →
Semafor4 Nov

California's proposed billionaire tax ballot measure has emerged as a broader critique of the state’s tech industry, reflecting public concerns over the impacts of technology on everyday life. While the tech sector has historically fueled California’s economic growth, issues like social media's effects on children and anxieties about AI are now drawing significant backlash. This shift is evident in unexpected…

California’s billionaire tax is a referendum on the tech industry →
Fox News4 Nov

California's Proposition 40, which would impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' assets, faces likely defeat as of Wednesday, despite support from the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). The measure aims to address a $100 billion shortfall in Medi-Cal funding by taxing the state’s wealthiest residents. Governor Gavin Newsom opposes the proposition, highlighting broader debates about socialist policies and…

Newsom breaks with socialists over billionaire tax, and California voters appear poised to reject it →
City A.M.8 Nov

California voters rejected a proposed one-off wealth tax of five percent on net worth above $1 billion through Proposition 40. The 'no' campaign was significantly funded by billionaires like Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who contributed over $100 million, giving them an overwhelming financial advantage over the pro-tax side. While opponents argue that such taxes harm the broader economy, the reliance on billionaire…

California has rejected wealth taxes, but for the wrong reasons →
Toronto Star10 Nov

California voters have rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of billionaires, after a high-spending campaign where critics like Google co-founder Sergey Brin raised over $100 million to defeat it. The measure would have generated funds to address federal healthcare funding cuts estimated at $100 billion over five years and support education and food assistance programs…

California voters reject measure to tax the wealth of billionaires →
NBC News10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% tax on the state’s billionaires with assets over $1.1 billion. The measure was projected to raise billions for healthcare but faced strong opposition from Democratic officials like Gov. Gavin Newsom and billionaire-funded campaigns. Critics argued it would lead to wealthier residents leaving California, reducing overall state revenue. The…

California voters reject new tax on billionaires in a blow to the left →
CBS News10 Nov

California voters have rejected a proposed tax on the state's wealthiest residents, according to CBS News projections. Proposition 40 aimed to impose a wealth tax on billionaires excluding real estate and certain retirement assets, with proceeds directed toward healthcare programs (90%) and education, food assistance, and administration (10%). The measure faced strong opposition from Governor Gavin Newsom and…

California voters reject billionaire wealth tax, CBS News projects →
Just the News10 Nov

In California’s midterm elections, voters rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires. The proposition received 47.2% support compared to 52.8% opposition. Most of the proposed tax revenue was intended to replace federal funding cuts for healthcare. Both supporters and critics from across party lines expressed varying views; opponents argued that it would be insufficient due to…

California voters reject billionaire tax measure →
Reason10 Nov

California voters have rejected Proposition 40, which proposed a one-time 5% tax on billionaires with over $1 billion in net worth. The measure was defeated by a margin of 52.8% to 47.2%. Propositions 41 and 42, competing measures designed to restrict wealth taxes, are also likely to pass, effectively banning such taxes in the state. Proponents argued that the tax could raise about $100 billion over five years for…

California Voters Reject 5% Billionaire Wealth Tax →
BBC10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, a ballot proposal that would have imposed a one-time wealth tax of 5% on individuals with over $1.1 billion in assets. The tax was intended to raise approximately $100 billion for healthcare funding amid federal cuts. Despite support from some Democrats and labour unions, the measure faced strong opposition from billionaires like Sergey Brin and California Governor Gavin…

Californians reject wealth tax for billionaires →
CBC10 Nov

California voters have rejected Proposition 40, which proposed a one-time five percent tax on the net worth of state billionaires exceeding $1 billion. The measure was heavily opposed by tech leaders such as Sergey Brin and Larry Page, who collectively spent over $333 million to defeat it—more than ten times what supporters raised. Critics argued that the tax would cause wealthy individuals to leave California…

California voters reject proposed billionaire tax →
South China Morning Post10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to implement a new wealth tax targeting billionaires, despite a projected Democratic surge in the midterm elections. Proponents estimated that Prop 40 could raise $100 billion for healthcare programs but failed due to opposition largely centered around recent federal tax breaks favoring wealthy individuals and corporations enacted under President Trump’s…

California billionaire tax measure defeated in contentious vote →
Euronews10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, which would have imposed a one-time tax of 5% on the net worth of around 200 billionaires in the state. The measure aimed to raise approximately $100 billion for public healthcare but was defeated due to concerns that it could drive wealthy individuals out of California. With about 60% of ballots counted, the "No" side led with 55.6%, and major broadcasters projected its…

California voters reject one-off billionaire wealth tax US media predicts →
Al Jazeera10 Nov

California voters have rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5 percent tax on individuals with a net worth exceeding $1 billion, raising an estimated $100 billion for healthcare and other public programs. With about 60% of votes counted, the measure was defeated by a margin of roughly 55.6% against it compared to 44.4% in favor. The proposal faced strong opposition from Governor Gavin Newsom and…

California voters reject billionaire tax →
The Daily Wire10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% wealth tax on billionaires' net worth, with 53% voting against it and 47% in favor. The measure was backed by Bernie Sanders and aimed to fund government health care programs; however, opponents argued that it would drive businesses out of the state. Governor Gavin Newsom opposed Proposition 40 but supported a national wealth tax instead…

Voters Shoot Down Bernie Sanders-Backed Billionaire Tax →
The Blaze10 Nov

California voters rejected Proposition 40 last Tuesday, which aimed to impose a one-time 5% wealth tax on billionaires residing in the state as of January 1, 2026. Endorsed by politicians like Bernie Sanders and Ro Khanna, the proposition faced strong opposition due to concerns that it would drive wealthy individuals out of California, potentially leading to a loss of tax revenue rather than gain. The proposal's…

Bernie-backed tax on billionaires is TOO extreme even for California →

Where they agree and split

Agreed

Reported by outlets on both sides of the middle

Brin and Larry Page, his fellow Google co-founder, were among the billionaires who began cutting ties with California in anticipation of the possible tax.

5 outlets
Show 3 more

Mark Zuckerberg said he would stay in California for eight years and made a deal with Meta that would help him pay the tax without losing his ownership stake in the company.

4 outlets

California's budget relies heavily on the income tax of the State's richest residents.

4 outlets

The committee has raised more than $333 million, about 30% of it from Brin.

4 outlets

Framing

How the first headlines put it

  • Time frames the debate around whether taxing wealth makes sense economically, while The Hindu highlights California's potential to become the first state to tax billionaires' wealth.12
Words to watch (1)

Sure, California voters overwhelmingly backed Democrats. But they refused to punish success. New York Post

The full story: what happened, how it changed, and all 42 articles →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 64/100
Washington Examiner
Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
NBC News
Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 77/100
NPR
Leans right further left than this Hedges 3 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
CBS News
Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Guardian
Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 65/100
Just The News
Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 94/100
Reason
Leans right further left than this Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 67/100
New York Post
Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 66/100

Story

California billionaire tax rejected
Politics · 42 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
55
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
6 of 55 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
42
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 10871 article(s) · 24 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 24 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Richard Littlejohn
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
The proposal (known as Prop 40), which would have slapped a 5 per cent levy on assets over $1billion, was defeated by 53 per cent to 47 per cent.
What could have caused me to have a change of heart?
Had he actually been on the ticket, the Republicans would have swept the board.
These include traditional wheelie bins, food caddies, woven sacks for cardboard boxes, and something called Trolibocs, which even I couldn’t make up.
Andy Burnham poses as a ‘straight kinda guy’ to borrow from Blair’s self-estimation, writes Richard Littlejohn So where will Andy Burnham’s ‘Back To The Future’ speech in Liverpool this week figure when the dust settles?
It would be more surprising if Bruce turned up in a red MAGA baseball cap.
Also by Richard Littlejohn
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Richard Littlejohn →

Topics

America Britain California Labour Prop 40

Subjects

California GPE · 4× Labour ORG · 4× America GPE · 3× Britain GPE · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Democrats NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Los Angeles GPE · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× San Francisco GPE · 1×

Narrative

That means they’ll probably cut back on ‘luxuries’ like trips to the pub and eating out, at a time when the hospitality industry is already struggling and shedding jobs, as a result of Labour’s sky-high taxes, red tape and increases in national insurance and the minimum wage for young employees.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-13
The proposal (known as Prop 40), which would have slapped a 5 per cent levy on assets over $1billion, was defeated by 53 per cent to 47 per cent.

Claims (55 extracted, 6 hedged)

A week after the historic shellacking handed out to Donald Trump and the Republicans in America’s midterm elections, the outcome of another significant vote was announced on Tuesday. asserted
outcome → hand → Tuesday
In California, one of the most Left-wing states in the Union, voters roundly rejected a wealth tax on billionaires. asserted
voters → reject → billionaires
The proposal (known as Prop 40), which would have slapped a 5 per cent levy on assets over $1billion, was defeated by 53 per cent to 47 per cent. asserted
which → know → cent
The Democrats swept the board in the midterms, increasing their majority in both chambers of the state legislature and winning convincingly the races for governor and mayor in both Los Angeles and San Francisco. asserted
Democrats → sweep → Angeles
But Prop 40 crashed and burned among Californians, worried about the potentially catastrophic economic consequences of penalising wealth creators. asserted
Prop → crash → creators
As Tom Leonard reported in the Daily Mail, a number of billionaires – including Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page – had already left the state in anticipation of the proposition being passed. asserted
number → report → proposition
America may have taken a lurch to the Left last week, largely as a result of a desire to give Trump a bloody nose, but the flame of free enterprise and wealth creation still burns brightly, writes Richard Littlejohn When Tesla and Starlink boss Elon Musk relocated his businesses to Texas to escape California’s high taxes and excessive regulation, between 3,500 and 6,000 jobs were lost. There were fears that an exodus of billionaires would have a devastating effect not just on the labour market but on tax revenues in general. A clever TV advertising blitz, funded to the tune of $400 million by tech bros, featured firefighters and teachers fearing for their jobs and concerned that a large-scale collapse in tax take would devastate public services. uncertain
collapse → take → services
America may have taken a lurch to the Left last week, largely as a result of a desire to give Trump a bloody nose, but the flame of free enterprise and wealth creation still burns brightly. uncertain
flame → take → enterprise
Del Boy Trotter’s optimistic ‘This time next year, Rodney, we’ll be millionaires’ lies at the heart of the aspirational American dream. asserted
we → lie → dream
Sadly the same can’t be said of British voters. asserted
same → say → voters
In a recent YouTube poll, 75 per cent supported some kind of wealth tax here. asserted
cent → support → tax
That may have given encouragement to those Labour MPs and far-Left activists clamouring to introduce a wealth tax in Britain. uncertain
That → give → Britain
But the California vote should give them pause for thought, although it probably won’t. asserted
it → give → thought
California voters gather for a rally in support of Prop 40, a wealth tax on billionaires which was rejected on Tuesday asserted
which → gather → Tuesday
The British Left is driven by the politics of resentment, not reality. asserted
Left → drive → resentment
Around 16,500 high net worth individuals have left the country since Labour came to power, taking an estimated $120billion with them – equivalent to the entire UK education budget and defence spending. asserted
Labour → leave → budget
Yet having lost a sizeable proportion of Britain’s sprinkling of billionaires, the Left is now turning its attention to millionaires to make up the shortfall. asserted
Left → lose → shortfall
Having milked family farms for every last penny, they are now targeting anyone lucky enough to live in a home worth more than £2million. asserted
they → milk → 2million
Labour is pressing ahead with plans for a ‘mansion tax’ under which those who live in high-value flats and houses will be hit with an annual council tax surcharge of between £2,500 and £7,500 – whether they can afford it or not. asserted
they → press → it
The Valuation Office has already warned that the threshold could be lowered to £1.5million. uncertain
threshold → warn → 1.5million
The Government denies that, but remember the original £150,000 threshold for the higher 45 per cent income tax rate was lowered to £125,000 – by former Tory Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt. asserted
threshold → deny → Chancellor
You can’t trust any of them, so Labour would have no compunction reducing the mansion tax cut-off. asserted
Labour → trust → off
Many of those facing these astronomical bills are millionaires on paper only, asset rich but cash poor, largely because of the rise of property prices especially in London and the South East. asserted
Many → face → London
When this tax grab was announced by former Chancellor Rachel From Complaints, I noted that there are plenty of older people on fixed incomes still living in the homes they bought donkey’s years ago for a few thousand pounds, yet are now worth a small fortune on the open market. asserted
they → announce → market
For instance, a modest terraced house in a not-especially fashionable North London suburb which we bought in 1985 for £95,000 with a monster mortgage was recently valued at £1.9 million – firmly in mansion tax territory. asserted
we → buy → territory
We moved out 12 years later, but some of our former neighbours – now pensioners – are still living there. asserted
some → move → neighbours
Where the hell are they expected to find an extra £2,500 a year? asserted
they → expect → 2,500
The problem with the British Left is that they have the economic literacy of a sulky Kevin the Teenager. asserted
they → have → Kevin
They just want to ‘soak the rich’ without thinking through the consequences. asserted
They → want → consequences
Make people two-and-a-half grand worse off and they’ll have less disposable income. asserted
they → make → income
That means they’ll probably cut back on ‘luxuries’ like trips to the pub and eating out, at a time when the hospitality industry is already struggling and shedding jobs, as a result of Labour’s sky-high taxes, red tape and increases in national insurance and the minimum wage for young employees. asserted
industry → mean → employees
Better-off home owners will probably decide to lay off staff such as cleaners and gardeners. asserted
owners → decide → cleaners
Labour’s tax grab will backfire on the very working people they claim to champion. uncertain
they → backfire → people
Home improvements will be postponed, especially as we learned this week that valuation officers will be visiting homes demanding to conduct ‘internal inspections’. asserted
officers → postpone → inspections
Outrageously, anyone who refuses to let them will face a fine of up to £500. asserted
who → refuse → 500
So if you don’t want some jumped-up jobsworth in a hi-viz jacket measuring your downstairs loo, nosing around in your knicker drawer, sifting through your cupboards, and checking to see if you’ve installed a new kitchen or bathroom, you’ll be landed with a criminal record. asserted
you → want → record
Yet still the Left isn’t satisfied and is agitating for an additional wealth tax which would impose a two per cent levy on anyone with assets of over £10million. asserted
which → agitate → 10million
In California, they only wanted to target super-rich billionaires. asserted
they → want → billionaires
In Britain they want to go after the moderately wealthy, even though it would inevitably lead to millionaires following the 16,500 wealth creators who have already left the country. asserted
who → want → country
Chauffeurs, domestic staff, high-end eateries and luxury stores have already suffered from the exodus of high net worth individuals, not to mention the billions of pounds of tax revenue lost to the Exchequer which could have been spent on Labour’s sacred schools’n’ospitals. uncertain
which → suffer → schools’n’ospitals
…and 15 more, not listed.
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support